๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐ŸŸก Degraded
Success Rate (7d)
86.5%
Builds (7d)
438
Median Duration
12m
P95: 21m
DORA Level
High
Deployment Frequency
15.7 / week
elite
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
14m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
31.4%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
8.5h
high
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
68.4%
โ–ฒ +4.2% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
2,443
โ–ฒ +2,120 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
10.6 min
โ–ผ -1.5 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Low
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
8.5h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
1.5h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 Check coreos-testing (44) akmods 56 27 4821.4%
0.421
3d ago Check for Build Failures
2 Build zfs coreos-testing (44) / Build aโ€ฆ akmods 56 27 4821.4%
0.421
3d ago Test Image
3 Check main (44) akmods 202 68 3366.3%
0.361
3d ago Check for Build Failures
4 Build common main (44) / Build x86_64 akmods 194 43 2216.5%
0.344
3d ago Test Image
5 Check main (42) akmods 190 68 3578.9%
0.343
3d ago Check for Build Failures
6 Check coreos-stable (42) akmods 180 65 3611.1%
0.322
3d ago Check for Build Failures
7 Check coreos-stable (44) akmods 41 12 2926.8%
0.309
3d ago Check for Build Failures
8 Check main (43) akmods 202 53 2623.8%
0.286
2d ago Check for Build Failures
9 Build zfs coreos-stable (44) / Build aaโ€ฆ akmods 39 10 2564.1%
0.283
3d ago Test Image
10 Check coreos-stable (43) akmods 192 57 2968.8%
0.276
2d ago Check for Build Failures
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
main 90.2% 85.9% 11m 388 ๐ŸŸข success
akmods 58.0% 68.8% 18m 50 ๐ŸŸข success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
main build-beta 0.0% 44.3% 0 8m 26d ago ๐ŸŸข
build-gts 90.2% 89.0% 194 12m <1h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-latest 90.2% 89.2% 194 12m <1h ago ๐ŸŸข
akmods build-akmods-coreos-stable 50.0% 66.2% 16 18m 6h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-akmods-coreos-testing 81.3% 59.4% 16 18m 6h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-akmods-main 44.4% 80.0% 18 17m 6h ago ๐ŸŸข
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
0/2
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
74.1%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
2/2
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

main
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
akmods
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
100.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/googleapis-release-please-action-5.x PR 16m 2026-05-26T06:53:28Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/googleapis-release-please-action-5.x PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:28Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:25Z 18/18 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue latest renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 16m 2026-05-26T06:53:25Z 16/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:20Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:20Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/dataaxiom-ghcr-cleanup-action-1.x PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:16Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/dataaxiom-ghcr-cleanup-action-1.x PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:16Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/googleapis-release-please-action-digest PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:12Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/googleapis-release-please-action-digest PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:12Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/extractions-setup-just-digest PR 17m 2026-05-26T06:53:09Z 18/18 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue gts renovate/extractions-setup-just-digest PR 14m 2026-05-26T06:53:09Z 16/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2495-de1d129bcdc97597a18b2349cb9924006b69546e other 6m 2026-05-26T05:30:12Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2495-de1d129bcdc97597a18b2349cb9924006b69546e other 18m 2026-05-26T05:30:12Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/googleapis-release-please-action-5.x PR 15m 2026-05-26T05:29:47Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/googleapis-release-please-action-5.x PR 16m 2026-05-26T05:29:47Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 14m 2026-05-26T05:29:44Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 15m 2026-05-26T05:29:44Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 15m 2026-05-26T05:29:40Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 15m 2026-05-26T05:29:40Z 18/18 โœ“

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.