๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐ŸŸก Degraded
Success Rate (7d)
92.0%
Builds (7d)
465
Median Duration
16m
P95: 40m
DORA Level
High
Deployment Frequency
91.5 / week
elite
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
28m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
7.1%
high
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
56.4h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
91.0%
โ–ผ -0.2% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
1,933
โ–ฒ +1,142 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
22.0 min
โ–ฒ +5.9 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Medium
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
56.4h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
5.5h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 build / sign bluefin-lts 2296 1608 7003.5%
0.356
today
2 Build Beta Images (bluefin) / image (nvโ€ฆ bluefin 15 9 6000.0%
0.335
1mo ago Build Image
3 Build Beta Images (bluefin) / Check allโ€ฆ bluefin 15 9 6000.0%
0.335
1mo ago Check Jobs
4 Build Beta Images (bluefin) / image (nvโ€ฆ bluefin 15 9 6000.0%
0.335
1mo ago Build Image
5 build (nvidia, oci/bluefin-nvidia.bst, โ€ฆ dakota 167 65 3892.2%
0.333
yesterday Build OCI image with BuildStream
6 build (default, oci/bluefin.bst, true, โ€ฆ dakota 172 68 3953.5%
0.328
yesterday Build OCI image with BuildStream
7 build dakota 374 256 6844.9%
0.323
today Build OCI image with BuildStream
8 build-dx-hwe / sign bluefin-lts 145 48 3310.3%
0.318
2d ago
9 build-dx / sign bluefin-lts 145 48 3310.3%
0.315
2d ago
10 build-hwe / sign bluefin-lts 145 46 3172.4%
0.311
2d ago
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
bluefin 97.1% 90.6% 30m 105 ๐Ÿ”ด action_required
bluefin-lts 96.5% 97.8% 16m 201 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
common 100.0% 99.3% 1m 60 ๐Ÿ”ด action_required
dakota 70.7% 77.9% 53m 92 ๐ŸŸข success
iso 0.0% 75.0% 17m 0 ๐ŸŸข success
finpilot 100.0% 100.0% 5m 7 ๐ŸŸข success
testhub 0.0% 100.0% 11m 0 ๐ŸŸข success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
bluefin build-image-beta 100.0% 66.7% 1 26m 2d ago ๐ŸŸข
build-image-latest-main 94.2% 89.2% 52 31m 4h ago ๐ŸŸก
build-image-stable 100.0% 92.2% 52 30m 4h ago ๐ŸŸก
bluefin-lts build-dx 97.4% 98.5% 38 15m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-dx-hwe 97.4% 97.8% 38 16m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-gdx 97.4% 98.5% 38 19m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-gnome50 81.8% 92.1% 11 19m 18h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-regular 97.4% 98.5% 38 13m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-regular-hwe 97.4% 97.1% 38 14m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
common build 100.0% 99.3% 60 1m <1h ago ๐ŸŸก
dakota build 70.7% 77.9% 92 53m <1h ago ๐ŸŸข
iso build-iso-all 0.0% 0.0% 0 21m 25d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-iso-lts-hwe 0.0% 100.0% 0 18m 14d ago ๐ŸŸข
build-iso-stable 0.0% 80.0% 0 16m 14d ago ๐ŸŸข
finpilot build 100.0% 100.0% 7 5m 19h ago ๐ŸŸข
testhub build 0.0% 100.0% 0 11m 17d ago ๐ŸŸข

Architecture Comparison

amd64
88.2%
7d success rate
16mavg duration262jobs (7d)
bluefin-lts88.2%
arm64
89.7%
7d success rate
14mavg duration262jobs (7d)
bluefin-lts89.7%
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
4/7
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
66.3%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
5/7
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

bluefin
Cosign Signing
95.2%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
95.2%
30d success rate
bluefin-lts
Cosign Signing
53.8%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
7.8%
30d success rate
common
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
dakota
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
40.0%
30d success rate
iso
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
finpilot
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
testhub
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
100.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
โšช common Build dxnext PR <1m 2026-05-26T07:23:51Z 0/0 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota auto/track-distrobox PR <1m 2026-05-26T07:13:28Z 4/4 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota auto/track-core-junctions PR <1m 2026-05-26T07:13:12Z 4/4 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด bluefin-lts Build Bluefin DX LTS HWE lts dispatch 8m 2026-05-26T07:09:05Z 2/5 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS HWE lts dispatch 9m 2026-05-26T07:09:02Z 2/5 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS GDX lts dispatch 8m 2026-05-26T07:09:00Z 2/5 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS DX lts dispatch 8m 2026-05-26T07:08:59Z 2/5 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS lts dispatch 8m 2026-05-26T07:08:57Z 2/5 โœ—
โšช bluefin Stable Images codex/remove-wallpaper-build-hack PR <1m 2026-05-26T03:03:35Z 0/0 โœ“
โšช bluefin Latest Images codex/remove-wallpaper-build-hack PR <1m 2026-05-26T03:03:35Z 0/0 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota fix/wallpaper-month-symlink PR <1m 2026-05-26T02:58:11Z 4/4 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota fix/justfile-parity-batch PR <1m 2026-05-26T02:57:01Z 4/4 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build codex/dynamic-wallpaper-common PR <1m 2026-05-26T02:47:18Z 1/1 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-523-a6a327e8fe15dd51c31c7c356764d1c0e890a635 other 102m 2026-05-26T02:37:54Z 5/5 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-521-1b88666d8d7ced4c58db07984997a7efcb24fb64 other 112m 2026-05-26T02:37:20Z 5/5 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota fix/justfile-parity-batch PR <1m 2026-05-26T02:36:06Z 4/4 โœ“
โšช dakota Build Bluefin dakota fix/include-search-light PR <1m 2026-05-26T02:14:48Z 0/0 โœ“
๐ŸŸข bluefin Stable Images main sched 35m 2026-05-26T01:36:43Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข dakota Build Bluefin dakota renovate/github-actions PR <1m 2026-05-26T00:49:37Z 4/4 โœ“
๐ŸŸข bluefin Stable Images renovate/dataaxiom-ghcr-cleanup-action-1.x PR 26m 2026-05-25T18:43:32Z 7/7 โœ“

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.