๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐Ÿ”ด Failing
Success Rate (7d)
29.9%
Builds (7d)
976
Median Duration
10m
P95: 42m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
57.3 / week
elite
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
46m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
70.8%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
47.5h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
20.4%
โ–ผ -32.9% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
2,079
โ–ฒ +177 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
16.9 min
โ–ผ -7.9 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Low
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
47.5h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
0.6h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 build / Build and push image (arm64) bluefin-lts 4736 2476 5228.0%
0.472
1mo ago Build Image
2 build / Create bluefin:stream10 Manifest bluefin-lts 4408 2736 6206.9%
0.466
today Exit on failure
3 build / Create bluefin-dx:stream10 Maniโ€ฆ bluefin-lts 3812 2388 6264.4%
0.465
today Exit on failure
4 build / Build and push image (amd64) bluefin-lts 10109 6509 6438.8%
0.449
today Build Image
5 build-dx-hwe / Build and push image (amโ€ฆ bluefin-lts 589 381 6468.6%
0.441
today Build Image
6 build-dx / Build and push image (amd64) bluefin-lts 589 381 6468.6%
0.439
today Build Image
7 build-hwe / Build and push image (amd64) bluefin-lts 588 378 6428.6%
0.439
today Build Image
8 build-dx-hwe / Create bluefin-dx:streamโ€ฆ bluefin-lts 590 383 6491.5%
0.438
today Exit on failure
9 build-hwe / Create bluefin:stream10 Manโ€ฆ bluefin-lts 590 380 6440.7%
0.438
today Exit on failure
10 build-dx-hwe / sign bluefin-lts 590 386 6542.4%
0.438
today
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
bluefin 43.1% 46.7% 30m 51 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
bluefin-lts 0.0% 0.0% 12m 642 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
common 99.2% 98.0% 9m 133 ๐ŸŸข success
dakota 92.0% 94.5% 50m 150 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
iso 0.0% 0.0% 16m 0 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
finpilot 0.0% 0.0% 4m 0 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
testhub 0.0% 0.0% 12m 0 ๐ŸŸข success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
bluefin build-image-beta 0.0% 0.0% 0 26m 124d ago ๐ŸŸข
build-image-latest-main 44.0% 46.6% 25 30m 8h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-image-stable 42.3% 46.8% 26 30m 8h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
bluefin-lts build-dx 0.0% 0.0% 121 12m 7h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-dx-hwe 0.0% 0.0% 121 13m 7h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-gdx 0.0% 0.0% 121 13m 7h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-gnome50 0.0% 0.0% 37 15m 7h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-regular 0.0% 0.0% 121 11m 7h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-regular-hwe 0.0% 0.0% 121 12m 7h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
common build 99.2% 98.0% 133 9m <1h ago ๐ŸŸข
dakota build 92.0% 94.5% 150 50m 5h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
iso build-iso-all 0.0% 0.0% 0 29m 24d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-iso-lts-hwe 0.0% 0.0% 0 12m 24d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-iso-stable 0.0% 0.0% 0 13m 24d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
finpilot build 0.0% 0.0% 0 4m 102d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
testhub build 0.0% 0.0% 0 12m 138d ago ๐ŸŸข

Architecture Comparison

aarch64
98.5%
7d success rate
4mavg duration135jobs (7d)
common98.5%
amd64
0.0%
7d success rate
10mavg duration753jobs (7d)
bluefin-lts0.0%
x86_64
97.8%
7d success rate
5mavg duration135jobs (7d)
common97.8%
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
1/7
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
33.5%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
4/7
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

bluefin
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
100.0%
30d success rate
bluefin-lts
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
common
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
dakota
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
iso
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐ŸŸข common Build renovate/projectbluefinactions PR 5m 2026-09-25T06:24:03Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/ffmpeg-thumbnailer-ujust-toggle PR 4m 2026-09-25T05:44:38Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/bluefin-review-skill PR 4m 2026-09-25T05:36:26Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸก common Build feat/bluefin-review-skill PR 2m 2026-09-25T05:35:01Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/escl-scanner-fixture PR 3m 2026-09-25T05:33:18Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/bluefin-review-skill PR 5m 2026-09-25T05:29:16Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/ffmpeg-thumbnailer PR 5m 2026-09-25T05:15:28Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/chairlift-wallpaper-bundles PR 5m 2026-09-25T05:15:23Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build fix/docs-only-build-checks PR 5m 2026-09-25T05:15:12Z 4/4 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/ffmpeg-thumbnailer PR 5m 2026-09-25T05:09:55Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/ffmpeg-thumbnailer PR 5m 2026-09-25T04:56:02Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build hive/1046-test-integration-contract PR 4m 2026-09-25T04:44:44Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/escl-scanner-fixture PR 4m 2026-09-25T04:41:40Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build scanner-usb-coexistence PR 4m 2026-09-25T04:03:02Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/damask-overrides-service PR 6m 2026-09-25T03:00:58Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/hidamari-wallpaper-video PR 6m 2026-09-25T03:00:52Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build feat/damask-user-setup PR 5m 2026-09-25T03:00:31Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build fix/ai-tools-align-agent-mode PR 6m 2026-09-25T03:00:05Z 3/3 โœ“
๐ŸŸข common Build sec/actions-security-baseline PR 8m 2026-09-25T02:59:35Z 3/3 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด dakota Build Bluefin dakota xbluefin-xonedo PR 7m 2026-09-25T00:52:49Z 0/0 โœ“

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.