πŸ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
πŸ”΄ Failing
Success Rate (7d)
16.8%
Builds (7d)
564
Median Duration
11m
P95: 38m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
52.4 / week
elite
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7Γ—/week, High: 1–7Γ—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
23m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
53.7%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: β‰₯15%.
MTTR
55.2h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
53.3%
β–² +0.1% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
1,902
β–Ό -2,784 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
24.8 min
β–² +12.0 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Low
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
55.2h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
0.8h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard β€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 build / Create bluefin-dx:stream10 Mani… bluefin-lts 2782 1326 4766.4%
0.473
today Exit on failure
2 build / Create bluefin:stream10 Manifest bluefin-lts 3232 1511 4675.1%
0.472
today Exit on failure
3 build / Build and push image (arm64) bluefin-lts 4832 2493 5159.4%
0.471
1mo ago Build Image
4 build / Build and push image (amd64) bluefin-lts 7387 3699 5007.4%
0.459
today Build Image
5 build / Create bluefin-gdx:stream10 Man… bluefin-lts 1391 905 6506.1%
0.450
today Exit on failure
6 build-dx-hwe / Build and push image (am… bluefin-lts 444 217 4887.4%
0.446
today Build Image
7 build-dx-hwe / Create bluefin-dx:stream… bluefin-lts 445 220 4943.8%
0.443
today Exit on failure
8 build-dx / Build and push image (amd64) bluefin-lts 444 218 4909.9%
0.442
today Build Image
9 build-hwe / Build and push image (amd64) bluefin-lts 443 214 4830.7%
0.442
today Build Image
10 build-hwe / Create bluefin:stream10 Man… bluefin-lts 445 216 4853.9%
0.442
today Exit on failure
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison β€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
bluefin 10.7% 62.0% 31m 28 🟒 success
bluefin-lts 0.0% 36.9% 13m 430 πŸ”΄ failure
common 93.2% 80.1% 3m 73 🟒 success
dakota 80.0% 36.0% 41m 30 🟒 success
iso 0.0% 6.7% 15m 3 πŸ”΄ failure
finpilot 0.0% 0.0% 4m 0 πŸ”΄ failure
testhub 0.0% 0.0% 11m 0 🟒 success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
bluefin build-image-beta 0.0% 0.0% 0 26m 72d ago 🟒
build-image-latest-main 0.0% 68.9% 13 32m 3d ago πŸ”΄
build-image-stable 20.0% 55.9% 15 31m 5h ago 🟒
bluefin-lts build-dx 0.0% 37.3% 81 12m <1h ago πŸ”΄
build-dx-hwe 0.0% 35.7% 81 14m <1h ago πŸ”΄
build-gdx 0.0% 37.4% 80 14m 12h ago πŸ”΄
build-gnome50 0.0% 35.5% 26 17m 12h ago πŸ”΄
build-regular 0.0% 37.3% 81 11m <1h ago πŸ”΄
build-regular-hwe 0.0% 37.3% 81 12m <1h ago πŸ”΄
common build 93.2% 80.1% 73 3m 13h ago 🟒
dakota build 80.0% 36.0% 30 41m 2h ago 🟒
iso build-iso-all 0.0% 0.0% 1 30m 3d ago πŸ”΄
build-iso-lts-hwe 0.0% 0.0% 1 12m 3d ago πŸ”΄
build-iso-stable 0.0% 8.3% 1 13m 3d ago πŸ”΄
finpilot build 0.0% 0.0% 0 4m 50d ago πŸ”΄
testhub build 0.0% 0.0% 0 11m 87d ago 🟒

Architecture Comparison

aarch64
84.1%
7d success rate
3mavg duration82jobs (7d)
common84.1%
amd64
0.0%
7d success rate
20mavg duration516jobs (7d)
bluefin-lts0.0%
iso0.0%
arm64
0.0%
7d success rate
3mavg duration4jobs (7d)
iso0.0%
x86_64
82.9%
7d success rate
4mavg duration82jobs (7d)
common82.9%
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
0/7
β‰₯95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
26.3%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
5/7
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data β€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

bluefin
Cosign Signing
56.8%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
56.8%
30d success rate
bluefin-lts
Cosign Signing
20.3%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.9%
30d success rate
common
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
dakota
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
iso
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as β€”.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin DX LTS HWE lts dispatch 7m 2026-08-04T06:50:06Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS HWE lts dispatch 10m 2026-08-04T06:50:05Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS DX lts dispatch 9m 2026-08-04T06:50:02Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS lts dispatch 9m 2026-08-04T06:50:00Z 2/4 βœ—
🟒 dakota Build Bluefin dakota next dispatch 6m 2026-08-04T04:34:05Z 5/5 βœ“
🟒 bluefin Stable Images main sched 42m 2026-08-04T01:32:13Z 7/7 βœ“
🟒 dakota Build Bluefin dakota testing push 183m 2026-08-04T01:30:43Z 5/5 βœ“
🟒 dakota Build Bluefin dakota testing push 108m 2026-08-04T00:47:50Z 3/5 βœ—
🟒 dakota Build Bluefin dakota testing push 101m 2026-08-03T20:59:27Z 5/5 βœ“
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin DX LTS HWE main push 10m 2026-08-03T18:35:25Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin GNOME 50 (testin… main push 10m 2026-08-03T18:35:25Z 8/16 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS main push 9m 2026-08-03T18:35:25Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS DX main push 11m 2026-08-03T18:35:25Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS GDX main push 9m 2026-08-03T18:35:25Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS HWE main push 9m 2026-08-03T18:35:25Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin DX LTS HWE gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-1722-52876891e6cb60f12cbdddffaf88cb7b762f07f4 other 10m 2026-08-03T18:34:51Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS HWE gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-1722-52876891e6cb60f12cbdddffaf88cb7b762f07f4 other 10m 2026-08-03T18:34:51Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS DX gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-1722-52876891e6cb60f12cbdddffaf88cb7b762f07f4 other 10m 2026-08-03T18:34:51Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS GDX gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-1722-52876891e6cb60f12cbdddffaf88cb7b762f07f4 other 10m 2026-08-03T18:34:51Z 2/4 βœ—
πŸ”΄ bluefin-lts Build Bluefin LTS gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-1722-52876891e6cb60f12cbdddffaf88cb7b762f07f4 other 9m 2026-08-03T18:34:51Z 2/4 βœ—

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics β€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0–10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA β€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0–L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates β€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM β€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster β€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security β€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional β†’ Operational β†’ Scalable β†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build β†’ Operate β†’ Scale β†’ Improve β†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate β€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA β€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework β€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.