๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐ŸŸก Degraded
Success Rate (7d)
83.3%
Builds (7d)
102
Median Duration
34m
P95: 45m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
3.9 / week
high
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
35m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
13.0%
medium
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
70.4h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
85.2%
โ–ฒ +18.3% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
639
โ–ฒ +485 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
27.9 min
โ–ฒ +2.0 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Medium
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
70.4h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
9.7h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (nviโ€ฆ aurora 146 89 6095.9%
0.413
4w ago Build Image
2 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (nviโ€ฆ aurora 146 91 6232.9%
0.400
4w ago Build Image
3 Build Beta Images (aurora) / Check all โ€ฆ aurora 146 91 6232.9%
0.400
4w ago Check Jobs
4 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (maiโ€ฆ aurora 146 50 3424.7%
0.291
4w ago Build Image
5 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (maiโ€ฆ aurora 146 47 3219.2%
0.275
4w ago Build Image
6 Build Stable Images (aurora) / Check alโ€ฆ aurora 429 94 2191.1%
0.261
today Check Jobs
7 Build Latest Images (aurora) / Check alโ€ฆ aurora 491 112 2281.1%
0.260
today Check Jobs
8 Build Stable Images (aurora) / image (mโ€ฆ aurora 429 78 1818.2%
0.256
today Build Image
9 Build Stable Images (aurora) / image (nโ€ฆ aurora 429 80 1864.8%
0.256
today Build Image
10 Build Stable Images (aurora) / image (nโ€ฆ aurora 429 74 1724.9%
0.253
today Build Image

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
aurora 79.3% 80.7% 33m 82 ๐ŸŸข success
common 100.0% 100.0% 1m 20 ๐ŸŸข success
iso 0.0% 100.0% 20m 0 ๐ŸŸข success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
aurora build-image-beta 0.0% 46.7% 0 31m 28d ago ๐ŸŸข
build-image-latest-main 82.5% 83.4% 40 33m 3h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-image-stable 76.2% 80.0% 42 33m 3h ago ๐ŸŸข
common build 100.0% 100.0% 20 1m 1d ago ๐ŸŸข
iso build-iso-stable 0.0% 100.0% 0 20m 13d ago ๐ŸŸข
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
1/3
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
59.8%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
2/3
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

aurora
Cosign Signing
96.2%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
97.3%
30d success rate
common
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
iso
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2264-65054627e6175ac95ad2e6df65f0596a3b8eba44 other 37m 2026-05-26T04:24:55Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2264-65054627e6175ac95ad2e6df65f0596a3b8eba44 other 40m 2026-05-26T04:24:55Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images renovate/quay.io-fedora-ostree-desktops-kinoite-44 PR 35m 2026-05-26T03:50:35Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images renovate/quay.io-fedora-ostree-desktops-kinoite-44 PR 35m 2026-05-26T03:50:35Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images main sched 36m 2026-05-26T01:42:30Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2262-a252a9cd3c5b137b7245217cd9da449d0c958fc1 other 35m 2026-05-25T21:23:14Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2262-a252a9cd3c5b137b7245217cd9da449d0c958fc1 other 38m 2026-05-25T21:23:14Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2262-a252a9cd3c5b137b7245217cd9da449d0c958fc1 other 39m 2026-05-25T20:40:29Z 7/7 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2262-a252a9cd3c5b137b7245217cd9da449d0c958fc1 other 32m 2026-05-25T20:40:29Z 4/6 โœ—
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images renovate/dataaxiom-ghcr-cleanup-action-1.x PR 36m 2026-05-25T18:45:30Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images renovate/dataaxiom-ghcr-cleanup-action-1.x PR 34m 2026-05-25T18:45:30Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images retire-stable-daily PR 30m 2026-05-25T16:42:34Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images retire-stable-daily PR 31m 2026-05-25T16:42:34Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2258-661289ec6b2e70320441e0a2239a26164f46fd4f other 38m 2026-05-25T15:45:52Z 6/6 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2258-661289ec6b2e70320441e0a2239a26164f46fd4f other 39m 2026-05-25T15:45:52Z 7/7 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2260-3417827edbb90e8556bc57ac058daab5c44071e7 other 37m 2026-05-25T15:43:27Z 5/6 โœ—
๐ŸŸข aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2260-3417827edbb90e8556bc57ac058daab5c44071e7 other 39m 2026-05-25T15:43:27Z 7/7 โœ“
๐ŸŸข aurora Latest Images chunkah-rootless-ci PR 37m 2026-05-25T14:11:53Z 6/6 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด aurora Stable Images chunkah-rootless-ci PR 15m 2026-05-25T14:11:53Z 1/6 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด aurora Stable Images chunkah-rootless-ci PR 14m 2026-05-25T13:50:17Z 1/6 โœ—

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.