๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐ŸŸก Degraded
Success Rate (7d)
83.3%
Builds (7d)
30
Median Duration
13m
P95: 39m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
17.1 / week
elite
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
23m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
20.4%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
72.9h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
82.6%
โ–ผ -2.3% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
201
โ–ฒ +102 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
19.0 min
โ–ผ -2.4 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Low
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
72.9h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
20.2h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 build-testing / Check builds successful ucore 247 76 3076.9%
0.383
4d ago Exit
2 build-testing / Check all successful ucore 247 110 4453.4%
0.376
4d ago Exit
3 build-testing / Build: ucore-nvidia-opeโ€ฆ ucore 222 48 2162.2%
0.358
2w ago Build Image
4 build-testing / Build: ucore-hci-nvidiaโ€ฆ ucore 222 47 2117.1%
0.356
2w ago Build Image
5 build-testing / Build: ucore-hci-nvidiaโ€ฆ ucore 222 49 2207.2%
0.353
2w ago Build Image
6 build-testing / Build: ucore-nvidia-opeโ€ฆ ucore 222 48 2162.2%
0.347
2w ago Build Image
7 build-lts / Check all successful ucore 244 77 3155.7%
0.321
4d ago Exit
8 build-stable / Check all successful ucore 244 79 3237.7%
0.318
5d ago Exit
9 build-lts / Check builds successful ucore 244 44 1803.3%
0.290
4d ago Exit
10 build-stable / Check builds successful ucore 244 43 1762.3%
0.287
2w ago Exit
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
ucore 83.3% 82.6% 16m 30 ๐ŸŸข success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
ucore build-lts 80.0% 92.3% 10 17m 3h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-stable 90.0% 92.3% 10 17m 3h ago ๐ŸŸข
build-testing 80.0% 63.1% 10 15m 3h ago ๐ŸŸข
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
0/1
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
83.3%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
1/1
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

ucore
Cosign Signing
97.3%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
94.3%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐ŸŸข ucore testing main sched 35m 2026-08-04T03:55:30Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore stable main sched 48m 2026-08-04T03:52:36Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore lts main sched 7m 2026-08-04T04:24:01Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore testing main sched 10m 2026-08-03T04:07:02Z 13/13 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore stable main sched 30m 2026-08-03T04:01:45Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore lts main sched 43m 2026-08-03T03:59:16Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore testing main sched 40m 2026-08-02T04:05:59Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore stable main sched 32m 2026-08-02T04:00:33Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore lts main sched 42m 2026-08-02T03:58:29Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore testing main sched 134m 2026-08-01T04:03:02Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore stable main sched 141m 2026-08-01T03:58:40Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore lts main sched 155m 2026-08-01T03:57:09Z 38/38 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore testing chore/pin-buildah-build-v3.0.2 PR 9m 2026-07-31T16:05:14Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore stable chore/pin-buildah-build-v3.0.2 PR 9m 2026-07-31T16:05:14Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸข ucore lts chore/pin-buildah-build-v3.0.2 PR 9m 2026-07-31T16:05:13Z 27/27 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด ucore testing main sched 23m 2026-07-31T04:03:43Z 27/30 โœ—
๐ŸŸข ucore stable main sched 56m 2026-07-31T03:58:43Z 38/38 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด ucore lts main sched 22m 2026-07-31T03:56:52Z 27/30 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด ucore testing main sched 9m 2026-07-30T03:53:51Z 8/13 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด ucore stable main sched 9m 2026-07-30T03:46:51Z 10/13 โœ—

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.