๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐Ÿ”ด Failing
Success Rate (7d)
44.4%
Builds (7d)
27
Median Duration
185m
P95: 313m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
2.1 / week
high
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
1.8h
high
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
71.4%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
73.2h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.

Monthly Overview

Success Rate (MoM)
27.9%
โ–ฒ +19.4% vs prior month
Total Builds (MoM)
55
โ–ผ -8 vs prior month
Avg Duration (MoM)
138.5 min
โ–ผ -9.6 min vs prior month
DORA Level
Low
This month

Monthly Overview

Monthly Build Outcomes
Monthly Build Duration
Monthly Success Rate by Repo
DORA Level Trend
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
73.2h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
22.6h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 test / empty-files-build cli 88 54 6136.4%
0.354
1mo ago Run Build
2 test / lint cli 94 47 5000.0%
0.344
3d ago Run build
3 test / build-chunked-oci-build cli 88 46 5227.3%
0.342
4w ago Run Build
4 build / amd64-prebuild cli 94 39 4148.9%
0.339
3d ago Run build
5 build / arm64-prebuild cli 94 40 4255.3%
0.335
3d ago Run EarthBuild/actions-setup@f4โ€ฆ
6 test / test cli 94 43 4574.5%
0.330
3d ago Run earthly/actions-setup@43211โ€ฆ
7 test / buildah-build cli 88 48 5454.5%
0.328
4w ago Run Build
8 test / bluefin-build cli 88 43 4886.4%
0.326
4w ago Run Build
9 test / multi-platform-docker cli 88 46 5227.3%
0.325
4w ago Run Build
10 test / integration-tests cli 94 47 5000.0%
0.317
3d ago Run integration tests
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
base-images 11.1% 21.9% 248m 9 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
cli 0.0% 0.0% 25m 3 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
modules 73.3% 70.6% 13m 15 ๐Ÿ”ด failure

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
base-images build 11.1% 21.9% 9 248m 19h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
cli main 0.0% 0.0% 3 25m 3d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
modules build 73.3% 70.6% 15 13m 1d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
0/3
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
28.1%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
3/3
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

base-images
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
cli
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
modules
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Collecting Scorecard data โ€” check back after the next sync.

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 285m 2026-09-24T11:30:28Z 21/24 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด modules build renovate/docker-setup-buildx-action-4.x PR <1m 2026-09-23T13:11:03Z 0/2 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 232m 2026-09-23T11:16:29Z 13/24 โœ—
๐ŸŸข base-images bluebuild main sched 280m 2026-09-22T11:21:05Z 24/24 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด modules build renovate/docker-setup-buildx-action-4.x PR <1m 2026-09-22T10:40:50Z 0/2 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด cli Main branch build main push 107m 2026-09-21T12:35:21Z 44/46 โœ—
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push 2m 2026-09-21T12:34:36Z 32/32 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-09-21T12:33:48Z 0/0 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 260m 2026-09-21T12:33:26Z 0/24 โœ—
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push 2m 2026-09-21T12:33:07Z 31/32 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด cli Main branch build main push 33m 2026-09-20T17:02:57Z 43/46 โœ—
๐ŸŸข modules build renovate/reviewdog-action-shellcheck-1.x PR 13m 2026-09-20T13:22:50Z 2/2 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 3m 2026-09-20T11:05:21Z 0/24 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด modules build renovate/docker-setup-buildx-action-4.x PR <1m 2026-09-19T17:38:09Z 0/2 โœ—
๐ŸŸข modules build renovate/docker-login-action-4.x PR 18m 2026-09-19T17:38:03Z 2/2 โœ“
๐ŸŸข modules build renovate/actions-checkout-7.x PR 14m 2026-09-19T14:05:06Z 2/2 โœ“
๐ŸŸข modules build renovate/zizmorcore-zizmor-action-0.x PR 16m 2026-09-19T14:04:58Z 2/2 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 1m 2026-09-19T10:42:49Z 0/24 โœ—
๐ŸŸข modules build renovate/sigstore-cosign-installer-4.x PR 13m 2026-09-19T10:02:22Z 2/2 โœ“
๐ŸŸข modules build renovate/hustcer-setup-nu-3.x PR 16m 2026-09-19T10:02:15Z 2/2 โœ“

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.