๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐Ÿ”ด Failing
Success Rate (7d)
62.5%
Builds (7d)
536
Median Duration
9m
P95: 24m
DORA Level
High
Deployment Frequency
5.8 / week
high
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
15m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
58.8%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
16.5h
high
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
16.5h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
1.4h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 Build common main (44) / Build x86_64 akmods 87 37 4252.9%
0.415
yesterday Test Image
2 Build common main (42) / Build x86_64 akmods 88 25 2840.9%
0.315
yesterday Test Image
3 Check main (44) akmods 93 60 6451.6%
0.295
today Check for Build Failures
4 Build common coreos-stable (42) / Buildโ€ฆ akmods 82 21 2561.0%
0.291
yesterday Test Image
5 Build common coreos-stable (42) / Buildโ€ฆ akmods 82 22 2682.9%
0.288
yesterday Test Image
6 Build common main (44) / Generate akmodโ€ฆ akmods 50 14 2800.0%
0.285
1w ago Login to GHCR for Attestation
7 Build common main (43) / Generate akmodโ€ฆ akmods 66 14 2121.2%
0.279
1w ago Login to GHCR for Attestation
8 Build nvidia-open main (42) / Generate โ€ฆ akmods 69 14 2029.0%
0.277
1w ago Login to GHCR for Attestation
9 Build nvidia-open main (43) / Generate โ€ฆ akmods 70 14 2000.0%
0.276
1w ago Login to GHCR for Attestation
10 Check main (42) akmods 93 49 5268.8%
0.276
today Check for Build Failures
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
main 65.1% 66.7% 8m 424 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
akmods 52.7% 52.8% 16m 112 ๐Ÿ”ด action_required

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
main build-beta 18.4% 21.1% 141 7m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-gts 92.2% 91.6% 141 9m <1h ago ๐Ÿ”ด
build-latest 84.5% 87.3% 142 9m <1h ago ๐ŸŸข
akmods build-akmods-coreos-stable 57.1% 55.7% 35 17m 5h ago ๐ŸŸก
build-akmods-coreos-testing 73.5% 63.8% 34 16m 5h ago ๐ŸŸก
build-akmods-main 32.6% 40.5% 43 16m 5h ago ๐ŸŸก
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
0/2
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
58.9%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
2/2
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

main
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
akmods
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
50.7%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue gts renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 10m 2026-04-08T06:05:14Z 16/18 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue beta renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 8m 2026-04-08T06:05:14Z 12/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 13m 2026-04-08T06:05:12Z 18/18 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue beta renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 6m 2026-04-08T06:05:12Z 12/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 10m 2026-04-08T06:05:12Z 18/18 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue beta renovate/extractions-setup-just-digest PR 5m 2026-04-08T06:05:09Z 12/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/extractions-setup-just-digest PR 10m 2026-04-08T06:05:09Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/extractions-setup-just-digest PR 10m 2026-04-08T06:05:09Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue beta gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2311-ebfac06d17825210e78e4184fcce0d41fe6ad042 other 5m 2026-04-08T05:18:59Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2311-ebfac06d17825210e78e4184fcce0d41fe6ad042 other 5m 2026-04-08T05:18:59Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2311-ebfac06d17825210e78e4184fcce0d41fe6ad042 other 14m 2026-04-08T05:18:59Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 12m 2026-04-08T05:18:21Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 12m 2026-04-08T05:18:21Z 18/18 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue beta renovate/extractions-setup-just-4.x PR 8m 2026-04-08T05:18:21Z 12/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 11m 2026-04-08T05:18:18Z 18/18 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด main ublue beta renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 5m 2026-04-08T05:18:18Z 12/18 โœ—
๐ŸŸข main ublue gts renovate/aszc-change-string-case-action-8.x PR 10m 2026-04-08T05:18:18Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/images PR <1m 2026-04-08T05:18:13Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue latest renovate/extractions-setup-just-digest PR 11m 2026-04-08T05:18:13Z 18/18 โœ“
๐ŸŸข main ublue beta renovate/images PR <1m 2026-04-08T05:18:13Z 18/18 โœ“

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.