๐Ÿ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
๐Ÿ”ด Failing
Success Rate (7d)
50.0%
Builds (7d)
8
Median Duration
41m
P95: 331m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
2.5 / week
high
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7ร—/week, High: 1โ€“7ร—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
5.3h
high
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
34.8%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: โ‰ฅ15%.
MTTR
32.9h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
32.9h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
23.1h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard โ€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 test / lint cli 28 19 6785.7%
0.389
yesterday Run build
2 test / empty-files-build cli 28 17 6071.4%
0.384
yesterday
3 build / arm64-prebuild cli 28 17 6071.4%
0.384
yesterday Run build
4 build / amd64-prebuild cli 28 18 6428.6%
0.356
yesterday Run earthly/actions-setup@43211โ€ฆ
5 test / multi-platform-buildah cli 28 19 6785.7%
0.348
yesterday Run Build
6 test / container-podman-build-chunked-oโ€ฆ cli 28 19 6785.7%
0.348
yesterday Run Build
7 test / iso-from-image cli 28 18 6428.6%
0.341
yesterday
8 test / iso-from-recipe cli 28 18 6428.6%
0.341
yesterday
9 test / container-podman-build cli 28 18 6428.6%
0.341
yesterday Run Build
10 test / build-chunked-oci-build cli 28 18 6428.6%
0.341
yesterday
Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison โ€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
base-images 57.1% 64.7% 297m 7 ๐ŸŸข success
cli 0.0% 0.0% 19m 1 ๐Ÿ”ด failure
modules 0.0% 0.0% 0m 0 โšช No data

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
base-images build 57.1% 64.7% 7 297m 23h ago ๐ŸŸข
cli main 0.0% 0.0% 1 19m 1d ago ๐Ÿ”ด
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
0/3
โ‰ฅ95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
19.0%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
2/3
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data โ€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

base-images
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
cli
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as โ€”.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Collecting Scorecard data โ€” check back after the next sync.

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
๐ŸŸข base-images bluebuild main sched 326m 2026-04-07T07:42:11Z 24/24 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด cli Main branch build main push 62m 2026-04-06T22:52:11Z 37/41 โœ—
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:51:33Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:51:03Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:50:36Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:49:54Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:49:19Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:48:46Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:48:16Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push <1m 2026-04-06T22:47:35Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push 1m 2026-04-06T22:46:24Z 27/27 โœ“
๐ŸŸก cli Main branch build main push 2m 2026-04-06T22:44:57Z 27/27 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 276m 2026-04-06T07:55:15Z 23/24 โœ—
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 313m 2026-04-05T07:17:12Z 23/24 โœ—
๐ŸŸข base-images bluebuild main sched 300m 2026-04-04T07:09:56Z 24/24 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด base-images bluebuild main sched 304m 2026-04-03T07:20:07Z 23/24 โœ—
๐ŸŸข base-images bluebuild main sched 300m 2026-04-02T07:23:12Z 24/24 โœ“
๐ŸŸข base-images bluebuild main sched 334m 2026-04-01T07:44:20Z 24/24 โœ“
๐ŸŸข base-images bluebuild main sched 54m 2026-03-31T12:46:32Z 24/24 โœ“
๐Ÿ”ด cli Main branch build main push 98m 2026-03-30T16:15:28Z 40/41 โœ—

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics โ€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0โ€“10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA โ€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0โ€“L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates โ€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM โ€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster โ€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security โ€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional โ†’ Operational โ†’ Scalable โ†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build โ†’ Operate โ†’ Scale โ†’ Improve โ†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate โ€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA โ€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework โ€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.