πŸ› File an issue
Pipeline Status
πŸ”΄ Failing
Success Rate (7d)
79.4%
Builds (7d)
175
Median Duration
32m
P95: 41m
DORA Level
Medium
Deployment Frequency
6.9 / week
high
How often builds are deployed. Elite: >7Γ—/week, High: 1–7Γ—/week, Medium: monthly, Low: less than monthly.
Lead Time
32m
elite
Time from commit to production. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Change Failure Rate
45.5%
low
Percentage of deployments causing a failure. Elite: <5%, High: <10%, Medium: <15%, Low: β‰₯15%.
MTTR
79.6h
medium
Mean time to restore service after a failure. Elite: <1h, High: <1d, Medium: <1wk, Low: >1wk.
Build Success Rate
Daily Build Outcomes
Build Duration Trends
Avg Duration by Repo
Failure Category Breakdown
MTTR
79.6h
Mean Time to Recovery
MTBF
6.8h
Mean Time Between Failures
Flakiness Leaderboard β€” Top 10 Flaky Jobs
# Job Name Repo Runs Failures Failure Rate Flakiness Index Last Failure Top Failing Step
1 Build Beta Images (aurora) / Check all … aurora 93 72 7741.9%
0.340
2d ago Check Jobs
2 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (nvi… aurora 93 72 7741.9%
0.340
2d ago Build Image
3 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (nvi… aurora 93 72 7741.9%
0.340
2d ago Build Image
4 Build Latest Images (aurora) / image (m… aurora 114 29 2543.9%
0.311
today Build Image
5 Build Latest Images (aurora) / image (n… aurora 114 32 2807.0%
0.302
today Build Image
6 Build Stable Images (aurora) / image (n… aurora 117 29 2478.6%
0.299
today Build Image
7 Build Latest Images (aurora) / image (n… aurora 114 29 2543.9%
0.294
today Build Image
8 Build Latest Images (aurora) / Check al… aurora 114 34 2982.5%
0.294
today Check Jobs
9 Build Stable Images (aurora) / Check al… aurora 117 31 2649.6%
0.290
today Check Jobs
10 Build Beta Images (aurora) / image (mai… aurora 93 34 3655.9%
0.289
2d ago Build Image

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scores from OpenSSF Scorecard. Click a card to view the full report.

Builds Per Day
Avg Queue Wait Time
Build Trigger Breakdown
Builder Comparison β€” All Repos
Repo Success Rate 7d Success Rate 30d Avg Duration Total Runs (7d) Last Stream Status
aurora 77.6% 70.8% 29m 156 🟒 success
common 94.4% 91.4% 1m 18 🟒 success
iso 100.0% 83.3% 17m 1 🟒 success

Stream Health

Repo Stream 7d Rate 30d Rate Runs (7d) Avg Duration Last Run Status
aurora build-image-beta 67.7% 30.9% 31 30m 2h ago 🟒
build-image-latest-main 77.4% 82.5% 62 29m <1h ago 🟒
build-image-stable 82.5% 86.9% 63 30m 1h ago 🟒
common build 94.4% 91.4% 18 1m 11h ago 🟒
iso build-iso-stable 100.0% 83.3% 1 17m 1h ago 🟒

Architecture Comparison

amd64
100.0%
7d success rate
26mavg duration2jobs (7d)
iso100.0%
Publish Reliability
Repos at Full Coverage
1/3
β‰₯95% success rate (7d)
Overall 7d Success Rate
90.7%
Avg across all repos
Repos with Recent Activity
3/3
Total runs > 0 (7d)

Publish step tracking requires live build data β€” shown after first successful CI run.

Supply Chain Security

aurora
Cosign Signing
96.6%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
96.6%
30d success rate
common
Cosign Signing
100.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate
iso
Cosign Signing
0.0%
30d success rate
SBOM Coverage
0.0%
30d success rate

Rates computed from workflow step names over last 30 days. Steps not detected in pipeline are shown as β€”.

Recent Builds
Repo Workflow Branch Trigger Duration Started Jobs
🟒 aurora Latest Images renovate/ghcr.io-ublue-os-brew-latest PR 35m 2026-04-08T06:07:06Z 6/6 βœ“
🟒 aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2016-528bad6a0d9583e5bbe11206b80753c76e8cd45e other 43m 2026-04-08T05:20:09Z 6/6 βœ“
🟒 aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2016-528bad6a0d9583e5bbe11206b80753c76e8cd45e other 47m 2026-04-08T05:20:09Z 7/7 βœ“
🟒 iso Build Stable ISOs main sched 27m 2026-04-08T05:10:58Z 2/2 βœ“
🟒 aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2021-4891e73688fe98649feb202d37f4b27bd06c8b98 other 36m 2026-04-08T04:59:23Z 6/6 βœ“
🟒 aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2021-4891e73688fe98649feb202d37f4b27bd06c8b98 other 38m 2026-04-08T04:59:23Z 7/7 βœ“
🟒 aurora Latest Images renovate/quay.io-fedora-ostree-desktops-kinoite-43 PR 34m 2026-04-08T04:26:23Z 6/6 βœ“
🟒 aurora Stable Images renovate/quay.io-fedora-ostree-desktops-kinoite-43 PR 33m 2026-04-08T04:26:23Z 7/7 βœ“
🟒 aurora Beta Images beta push 40m 2026-04-08T04:08:54Z 5/5 βœ“
🟒 aurora Beta Images inffy-patch-1 PR 33m 2026-04-08T03:53:50Z 5/5 βœ“
🟒 aurora Stable Images main dispatch 37m 2026-04-07T20:43:03Z 7/7 βœ“
🟑 aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2016-4891e73688fe98649feb202d37f4b27bd06c8b98 other 19m 2026-04-07T20:23:27Z 5/6 βœ—
🟑 aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2016-4891e73688fe98649feb202d37f4b27bd06c8b98 other 19m 2026-04-07T20:23:27Z 5/6 βœ—
🟒 aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2017-da5cca2e9e8fcf6e1b4ed17557a32de7b4934915 other 38m 2026-04-07T20:00:53Z 6/6 βœ“
🟒 aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2017-da5cca2e9e8fcf6e1b4ed17557a32de7b4934915 other 41m 2026-04-07T20:00:53Z 7/7 βœ“
🟒 aurora Latest Images renovate/ghcr.io-get-aurora-dev-common-latest PR 35m 2026-04-07T19:31:10Z 6/6 βœ“
🟒 aurora Stable Images renovate/ghcr.io-get-aurora-dev-common-latest PR 36m 2026-04-07T19:31:10Z 7/7 βœ“
🟒 common Build main dispatch <1m 2026-04-07T19:27:33Z 1/1 βœ“
πŸ”΄ aurora Latest Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2016-da5cca2e9e8fcf6e1b4ed17557a32de7b4934915 other 39m 2026-04-07T18:25:52Z 4/6 βœ—
🟒 aurora Stable Images gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2016-da5cca2e9e8fcf6e1b4ed17557a32de7b4934915 other 41m 2026-04-07T18:25:52Z 7/7 βœ“

Further Reading

The metrics on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research and open standards. These resources explain what each metric means, why it predicts software delivery performance, and how to improve it.

Software Delivery Performance
DORA Metrics β€” Four Keys

The canonical framework for measuring software delivery: Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service. Published by Google Cloud's DevOps Research and Assessment team and validated across thousands of organizations since 2014.

Supply Chain Security
OpenSSF Scorecard

Automated security health checks for open source projects, scoring 0–10 across checks including signed releases, SBOM presence, branch protection, pinned dependencies, and CI test coverage. Produced by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a Linux Foundation project.

Supply Chain Security
SLSA β€” Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts

A graduated framework (L0–L3) for verifiable software build integrity. Each level adds stronger guarantees: L1 means provenance exists, L2 means it is signed by a hosted build platform, L3 means the build environment itself is hardened and isolated. Developed by Google and adopted as an OpenSSF standard.

Supply Chain Security
Sigstore / Cosign

Keyless, identity-based artifact signing backed by a public transparency log (Rekor). Cosign signs and verifies container images and release artifacts using short-lived OIDC certificates β€” no long-lived private keys to manage or rotate. A CNCF project used by Kubernetes, Tekton, and the Bluefin image pipeline.

Supply Chain Security
SBOM β€” Software Bill of Materials

A machine-readable inventory of every component and dependency in a software artifact. SBOMs make vulnerability response faster β€” when a new CVE is published, you can immediately know which of your images are affected. The OpenSSF SBOM Everywhere SIG maintains tooling guidance and naming conventions.

Supply Chain Security
CNCF TAG Security β€” Supply Chain Best Practices

The CNCF Technical Advisory Group for Security publishes authoritative whitepapers on cloud-native supply chain security. The Software Supply Chain Best Practices paper (v2, 2025) and the Secure Software Factory reference architecture define the practices that the Scorecard and SLSA checks encode.

Platform Engineering
CNCF Platforms White Paper

The authoritative CNCF definition of what internal developer platforms are, what they should measure (user satisfaction, self-service rate, onboarding time), and how platform teams should operate. Published by the TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group. Recommends DORA metrics as the delivery measurement standard for platform teams.

Platform Engineering
Platform Engineering Maturity Model

A 4-level model (Provisional β†’ Operational β†’ Scalable β†’ Optimizing) across five aspects: Investment, Adoption, Interfaces, Operations, and Measurement. Helps platform teams understand where they are and what practices characterize the next level. Published by the CNCF TAG App Delivery Platforms Working Group.

Platform Engineering
Cloud Native Maturity Model

A 5-level model (Build β†’ Operate β†’ Scale β†’ Improve β†’ Adapt) across Business Outcomes, People, Process, Policy, and Technology. Maintained by the CNCF Cartografos Working Group. Version 4 (2025) adds AI and FinOps dimensions. Useful for understanding where cloud-native adoption fits in the broader organizational journey.

Research
Accelerate β€” The Science of Lean Software and DevOps

The peer-reviewed research behind DORA metrics. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim identified 24 technical, process, and cultural capabilities that predict software delivery performance and organizational outcomes. Required reading for understanding why deployment frequency and lead time matter.

Research
SRE Golden Signals

Google's Site Reliability Engineering book defines four signals sufficient to monitor any user-facing service: Latency, Traffic, Errors, and Saturation. These are the production observability complement to DORA β€” they define what a "failure" actually is (without them, Change Failure Rate cannot be accurately measured) and predict when MTTR will spike before incidents occur.

Research
SPACE Framework β€” Developer Productivity

DORA measures what the pipeline does; SPACE measures how developers experience it. Developed by Nicole Forsgren (GitHub), Margaret-Anne Storey, and colleagues at Microsoft Research. Five dimensions: Satisfaction, Performance, Activity, Communication/Collaboration, and Efficiency. Never measure activity in isolation.